A self-assessment checklist from the EU High-Level Expert Group on AI that helps you test an AI system against the seven requirements for trustworthy AI and spot where you need extra measures.
| Full name | Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence |
| Website | https:// |
| Developed by | High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG), European Commission (2020) |
| Type | Assessment: Self-assessment checklist (PDF and web tool) |
| Lifecycle phase | Design, Development, Deployment |
| FUTURE-AI | General recommendations, Robustness, Fairness |
| For | AI developers, Policy makers and managers |
| Facilitation | Facilitator recommended |
| Skills needed | none |
| Cost | Free |
| Languages | English |
| Maturity | Established |
| Licence | European Commission reuse policy (Decision 2011/833/EU); reuse allowed with acknowledgement |
What it is¶
ALTAI turns the 2019 Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI into questions, grouped under seven requirements: human agency and oversight, technical robustness and safety, privacy and data governance, transparency, diversity, non-discrimination and fairness, societal and environmental well-being, and accountability. You answer them with a multidisciplinary team, ideally after a fundamental rights impact assessment, and pick the questions that fit your system and sector. It is a reflection tool, not a certification: completing it does not prove compliance. It comes as a PDF and as an interactive web version with extra explanatory notes.
In healthcare¶
ALTAI is sector-neutral. In clinical AI it works well as a broad first pass over ethical and technical risks before you move to medical-device and AI Act specific checks.
Where to use it in The ELSA Way¶
Risk management planning › 1. Risk identification: Its seven requirement areas give your interdisciplinary team a broad prompt list, so you catch ethical, societal and technical risks that a purely technical review would miss.
Ethical review and approval › Application-specific ethical issues: Many of its questions, on human oversight, non-discrimination, accountability and environmental well-being, line up with the ethical concerns you need to document during design.
References¶
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) for self-assessment. Brussels: European Commission; 2020. undefined (2020)
Related tools¶
IAMA: A structured discussion guide that helps a public organisation decide whether and how to use an algorithm, with a step-by-step check of its effects on fundamental rights.
AI Impact Assessment: A question set that walks a multidisciplinary team through the purpose, impact, technical design, data and risks of an AI system, and records the decision whether to use it.
Algoritmekader: A Dutch government website that brings together the legal requirements, recommended measures and supporting tools for responsible use of algorithms and AI, organised by lifecycle phase, role and topic.
- European Commission. Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. (2020). The Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) for self assessment. Publications Office. 10.2759/002360